The Chicago Manual of Style by University of Chicago Press

The Chicago Manual of Style

The 15th edition of The Chicago Manual of Style has been superseded by the 17th edition. In the 1890s, a proofreader at the University of Chicago Press prepared a single sheet of typographic fundamentals intended as a guide for the University community. That sheet grew into a pamphlet, and the pamphlet grew into a book—the first edition of the Manual of Style, published in 1906. Now in its fifteenth edition, The Chicago Manual of Style—th...

Details The Chicago Manual of Style

TitleThe Chicago Manual of Style
Release DateAug 1st, 2003
PublisherThe University of Chicago Press
GenreReference, Language, Writing, Nonfiction, Humanities

Reviews The Chicago Manual of Style

  • Mark
    It doesn't matter if you're a fan of MLA, AP, or even (dare I say it) Franklin Covey, the Chicago Manual of Style will never let real-world writers and editors* down. Sure, at first you'll stagger through its appendix and feel overwhelmed by the layout, but rest assured, with time, you'll come to rely on it like your trusty blankey that has always been there for you through all these years.*By real-world writers and editors, I mean that elitist c...
  • Katherine
    My Bible. Why did they have to change the rule about a bold or italic punctuation mark being set bold or italic according to the preceding typeface? Why don't they include better samples of how to abbreviate journal titles for Documentation II style?Why is the index still horrendous?I use this book every single day, even if I'm just threatening my dog with it to get her off the furniture.
  • Mir
    Too heavy, too expensive, and too orange. Other than that, it is great! Very thorough and well-organized. This is the only style guide I've had where I could both locate the information I needed quickly and get a sufficiently clear and complete explanation to be sure how it applied to my own writing.
  • Erik Graff
    Having been laid off from my happy position at Loyola University Chicago, having no luck at finding a similar position there or elsewhere and being semi-employed by a small academic publishing house, I decided to get serious about another career. So, I started publishing lots reviews and one scholarly article and began trying to drum up editorial work. Being already familiar with the MLA style, I picked up a copy of the Chicago Manual of Style an...
  • Carlston Floyd
  • Lavina
    The serial comma is a beautiful, perfect thing. This book is nowhere near perfect, but there's nothing else like it.
  • Steven
    I was working on an essay for which I had to cite a particularly bibliographically complex book; it was a commentary by Averroës, translated by one person, introduced by another, and edited by yet another poor soul. I hadn't a clue how to formulate all the relevant information in my bibliography. Throughout my psychology master’s program, it was easy: it was all APA, everything was always APA. But now I realized that, for my philosophical essa...
  • Mariana
    This is the book that should be in every drawer in every hotel room. I'll get right on the phone with the Gideons.
  • Sin Claire
    This is a book to be revered. If more of the aspiring writers who upload their works to Kindle and Nook spent a month or two getting acquainted with its contents, they could avoid the kinds of mistakes that anger readers. Almost every reader has some grammar pet peeve. The thing that drives them up the wall may not even register with you.There are various works online and in print that claim to be the "Bible" of self publishing. This is the only ...
  • Will Mego
    Can you read a style guide?Yes. The middle parts of them are essentially books on grammar.This is the best of them.
  • Serena W. Sorrell
    Review for 17th edition:This is--by far--a better edition than the last. In addition to making some much needed revisions, gender identity pronouns and updated practices have been added. Overall, the style is smoother and more user friendly than the last edition, which was overly dry most of the time and made for a difficult once through read. As this is my primary textbook and resource for the copyediting program I'm currently enrolled in (not t...
  • Searcy
    The ultimate style ref :)
  • Jeff
    Both useful and delightful for anyone interested in writing or the making of books.
  • Clare
    At my fancy new freelance gig there is often some downtime between jobs, which, after having examined all of the house style guides multiple times I decided to use to review the CMoS, since I haven’t actually had to use it in a while. And that, dear reader, is how I ended up reading the entire Chicago Manual of Style, Fifteenth Edition, by the University of Chicago Press, cover to cover. (Yes, I know that’s not how style guides are mean to be...
  • Betsy
    Anyone who aspires to be an editor of any sort -- developmental, line, but especially copy -- must buy this book and learn how to find what's in it quickly and easily. It seems every other person I meet these days describes herself as an editor, but I rather doubt that they really know what that means. Being literate and knowing about the serial comma do not make you an editor. The U of C Manual of Style is indispensable, a must-have. And when ea...
  • Ioana
    Chicago >>>> (by orders of magnitude) MLA or APA*. And this is the best reference ever: what to do if an author translates her/his own work into another language? how to alphabetize that writer with 3 last names? what about that quote gathered from the annals of a local community committee council that seems to have no publisher? No need to fret, the Chicago Manual of Style's got your back.* Still embittered that I couldn't convince my advisor to...
  • Richard
    Ok, so I didn't actually read every single word, but I did go through this thoroughly as part of a class on editing.The Bible. Accept no substitutes. (And if you don't use Oxford commas, there is just no hope for you.)
  • Amanda
    I guess I can't really say that I've read this book, but I've definitely used it. Few books have kept me up later into the night. When you find a really great exposition on dashes and hyphens, who needs sleep???
  • Jeanne
    One of my students gave me a Barnes and Noble gift certificate at the end of school term. It was enough to cover the hefty price of this manual. I have been wanting to buy this for a long time and I will be using it for years, so the price is really not as great as the value.
  • Nicole Sampson
    This is very well organized and easy to use. The online version is even easier because of the search option.
  • Kristina Leonard
    Shockingly readable. It was work-related anyway!
  • Silke
    Ok, I'll admit I have not read it cover to cover...
  • RexcatReader
    There is never a question left unanswered. In a world of uncertainty, this is our foundation.
  • Katherine
    Don't edit copy without it.
  • Craig Pearson
    Very dry subject matter. Bad memories of all the writing needed for my master's program. I understand the need for conformity but my simple mind could not get past the complex rules of writing.
  • Adam Tripodi
    Either a person likes the MLA or APA format, The Chicago Manual Style can never let a writer down. It might be heavy on the pocket, but it is one of the most thorough and well-organised books I have ever read. The book is straightforward to understand. An individual can effortlessly locate the desired information, and it will be elaborated in detail for the writer to apply to their work. After a thorough read of the book, I could differentiate be...
  • B.C.
    Anyone who wants to be a professional writer needs to have a copy of this book.Can't exactly be a writer if you don't understand the mechanics of American English. All the standards followed by most publishing houses is from the CMS. Even if one doesn't use it to study diligently, it's good to have within reach to know how to reference something or when certain words should by hyphenated, and so on.
  • Drew
    Chicago Manual of Style leaves AP, APA, MLA, and every other chump-ass style book in the dust. The main difference? It's not just about capitalization, citation, and annotation. Grammar. It has the best and most concise explanation of grammar minefields such as "effect" vs. "affect". A must-have for any shelf.
  • Yaaresse
    I think the version I had was so old as to be the 5th or 6th edition. Who knows for sure? I can't find it here on GR. Still, I'm counting this sucker as read. It and I spent far too much time chained to each other in college. I remember the index was useless. The examples sometimes conflicted. Still, our newsroom managed to wear out a dozen or more copies each semester.