Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman

Amusing Ourselves to Death

Television has conditioned us to tolerate visually entertaining material measured out in spoonfuls of time, to the detriment of rational public discourse and reasoned public affairs. In this eloquent, persuasive book, Neil Postman alerts us to the real and present dangers of this state of affairs, and offers compelling suggestions as to how to withstand the media onslaught. Before we hand over politics, education, religion, and journalism to the ...


Details Amusing Ourselves to Death

TitleAmusing Ourselves to Death
ISBN9780143036531
Author
Release DateDec 27th, 2005
PublisherPenguin Books
LanguageEnglish
GenreNonfiction, Sociology, Philosophy, Cultural, Politics, Psychology
Rating

Reviews Amusing Ourselves to Death

  • Trevor
    1970-01-01
    This really is a book that needs to be read. I’m going to start with the quote that got me to read this book:“We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares. But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, the...
  • s.penkevich
    1970-01-01
    ‘What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.'The modern era is an age of endless information and entertainment. Media looks to the public for what they want, and then sells it back to them wrapped up in the most irresistible packaging they can create, and we eat it up. However, if entertainment is what we desire most, and...
  • Jennifer
    1970-01-01
    As I sit down to write this, President Trump has just described Frederick Douglass as "someone who has done a terrific job that is being recognized by more and more people." (February 1, 2017).Frederick Douglass was an African American abolitionist, writer, and reformer who died in 1895. Apparently, the President of the United States has no idea who Frederick Douglass was, since he is referring to Douglass in the present tense. I have been strugg...
  • David
    1970-01-01
    Well, yes, Mr Postman. You're undoubtedly right in much of your analysis. And I suppose it was prescient of you to be so right way back in 1985 when you wrote this book.But having said that, I'm not sure what else to add. Here we are in 2009. Arnold Schwarzenegger is governor of the state I live in. But the republic hasn't fallen. The barbarians are just an annoyance, not a threat. Newspapers may be undergoing a steep decline, but it would be pre...
  • Hadrian
    1970-01-01
    Amusing Ourselves to Death is a doom-and-gloom prophecy about the dangers of television and the hazardous effects of passively receiving information instead of critically engaging with it. All other factors become subsumed to the desire to entertain and draw as many viewers as possible, whether in education, news, or even religion, with the rise of the TV preacher.In 1985, this might not have been wrong. But we are now in 2014, and the situation ...
  • booklady
    1970-01-01
    I think this was my introduction to Postman and I read this book in a day; it's 163 pages. Yes, I like to read, but even so back then with two little kids, I rarely read that much in month much less a day! I had two nearly-hyperactive (okay yes they were girls) kids of four and five. I only mention this so you know just how big an impression this book made on me at the time. Up until then I frequently resorted to letting the kids 'do' videos seve...
  • Joseph
    1970-01-01
    If someone held a gun to my head and asked for a precise and concise definition of irony (it could happen!), I would say only this: Neil Postman died two days before Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected governor -thus narrowly missing out on the single best example of what he was screaming about all those years ago. This book was foundational for me. Postman delivers a passioned polemic about the entertain-at-any-cost ethos of our current culture, a...
  • Jon
    1970-01-01
    "This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right." - Neil PostmanIn 1854 Stephen A. Douglas presented a three-hour speech against Abraham Lincoln's ideas, and in return, on that same night, Lincoln responded with a three-hour argument of his own. The surprise? People actually stayed long enough to hear both men out.Contrast that with the Republican debate that happened last night: 8 candidates were forced to answer leading, ...
  • Rickeclectic
    1970-01-01
    Disappointing. Read it if you have to (it is considered to be an "important" book for media folks), but otherwise, just read the following and skip the book. Mr. Postman is obviously a well read person and the book claims the values logic and argument, but his arguments are off kilter. This is especially disappointing because the topic is important and he is a good writer in the classic sense of being able to put interesting sentences together.Hi...
  • Giacinta
    1970-01-01
    This was an astonishing book. I picked it up from the library but I really want my own copy now. I was nervous about it because it was written a while ago, before the Internet was the all-pervasive force it is today. I thought it's a book about media, it will be dated, it will say television is bad for you, etc. But it really surprised me. The point of the book is about how the advent of television influenced public discourse and politics. The bo...
  • Anne
    1970-01-01
    There's a good feeling you get when you read a book that accurately criticizes something that needs it. If you've ever felt like watching TV was a waste of time, this book will impart such a feeling.Not to mention, providing an arsenal of reasons why TV is a general waste of time.Why, just two days ago my 3rd grade students asked me why the 4th graders at our school always get to watch videos in class and we don't.With Postman's support in my bac...
  • Kris
    1970-01-01
    Can’t believe this was written in 1985. It feels like Postman knows of Twitter and Reddit and all the other 2019 news media outlets and social media platforms.He has some fascinating points, and somehow seems to predict the future. It’s about television, but it’s really about the Internet, before the Internet existed. An easy, short read, packed full of insights. Would recommend.Read raffaela's 4-star review of Amusing Ourselves to Death: P...
  • Brian Eshleman
    1970-01-01
    I don't know how many commentaries in our culture it could be said to be more relevant now than when they were written 25 years ago, but this one can. If we were distracted and distractible then, demanding television-style stimulation even on serious subjects, we certainly are now. Television's defining role has simply been replaced by stimuli from many different directions. Postman rightly cautions us to be wary of the impact of how a message is...
  • Kressel Housman
    1970-01-01
    Anyone remember the pre-Internet days of the 1980’s when television was still king? That’s when this book was written, so for every rant author Neil Postman made against television, I was wondering, “What would he say now?” He lived till 2003, and a Google search will show you that he railed against the Internet, too, but he never lived to see the rise of social media and texting. What would he have said about summing up your personal new...
  • Stephen Hicks
    1970-01-01
    It’s hard to over-exaggerate the prescient nature of this book. If only Postman were around to comment on the “Leader of the Free World” revealing foreign and domestic policy over Twitter. I’d read that. But he provides enough here to occupy our minds so that we may attempt to think through our present absurdities. The Trump administration is low-hanging fruit to use as fodder in light of this book. Mr. Postman speaks to so much more. He ...
  • David
    1970-01-01
    Orwell believed the government would hide the truth, ban books, and in essence dominate people. Huxley believed people would have access to so much information they would not know what truth is and there would be so much entertainment no one would read.Huxley was right.Postman's work is an extended analysis of television. It is a bit dated since he writes at the onset of computers. Much of what he said holds true, but it would be interesting to g...
  • Erika RS
    1970-01-01
    This book makes two good points: the media used to communicate affects the nature of the communication, and much of modern communication on serious matters is frivolous.That covers the first part of the book. The rest is a tiresome rant about how TV is ruining us all. The details of the rant are not worth covering, but I do think that Postman misses some important points. First, he never looks to see if there is any good in a visual based communi...
  • Ryan Holiday
    1970-01-01
    Amusing Ourselves to Death is the spiritual sequel to Boorstin's The Image. Postman wants us to realize that there is something inherently inferior about the information we consume through visual media. Forget television designed for entertainment - which is at least honest - and focus in something like a news segment. As far as its creators are concerned, the worst thing that it could possibly do is inspire or provoke you, two horrible emotions ...
  • Ali Reda
    1970-01-01
    Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one w...
  • Abby
    1970-01-01
    “What Orwell feared was those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared that the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance...
  • Bilal Anis
    1970-01-01
    Definitely one of the most important books I ever read in my life! It is widely said that each book teaches you something.. but this book taught me more things that I can recall. It is a book that was written in 1985 but it is talking about the major problem we are having to day when it come to technology when used as a source of information. This book will change your attitude toward the current media outlets whether it is TV, radio, internet, o...
  • Tracey
    1970-01-01
    This book had been on my To Read list for quite some time; a mention in The Geography of Nowhere was the final spur to check it out from the library. Postman takes a look at how our perception of the world is affected by the medium in which we receive information about it; contrasting the Age of Print (the 18th & 19th centuries) with our current age - starting with the telegraph and continuing through to the computer. Obviously, the main focus is...
  • Paul Gier
    1970-01-01
    Postman provodes an insightful analysis about how the medium of communication (speech, writing, television) has a significant effect on the information that is communicated. Television is limited to providing information without context because the communication happens only in a single direction and has strict time limitations. Television is a great medium for entertainment, but it is generally counter-productive as a medium for for communicatin...
  • Murtaza
    1970-01-01
    Well I wish I could explain how much I loved this book in a short paragraph but I don't feel that I would do it full justice. A brilliant exposition of how new forms of information technology; without our consent or even active notice, have entirely rewired our culture. In effect, the explosion of visual media has made us demand everything from politics to religion to science be packaged as 'entertainment'. Correspondingly, it has led to the triv...
  • Jordan Shirkman
    1970-01-01
    “For no medium is excessively dangerous if its users understand what its dangers are.”Considering this book was written in 1985, it can be considered prophetic and accurate in its predictions in almost every way (save when he says the importance of computers is vastly overrated.)I wish Postman was alive to comment on our constantly connected world, how we have even further built our society and culture on the electrical plug, and, of course, ...
  • Parita
    1970-01-01
    I think this a must-read for everyone today. This book was written focusing on television but the message it is trying to convey is even more relevant with the social media today. The book does a great job of analysing different aspects of the impact of this "Age of Show Business" with examples. He may seem harsh at times but I couldn't help but agree with him on most points. To quote one of them - "When a population becomes distracted by trivia,...
  • John
    1970-01-01
    Wow, what a read! This is a book that everyone should read. Postman has diagnosed the problem that most of us didn't even know existed. The trouble is there really is no easy cure. Each person must act upon his solution individually and take responsibility for himself and his family.I have never given so much thought to how to educate my children as I have in the past twenty-four hours that I have been reading this book.
  • Rebecca
    1970-01-01
    Note to self: It's time to read Brave New World again...Despite having been published in 1985 on a topic (media) that is currently changing faster than ever before and has come light years (almost literally) since its release, this is a book well worth reading for anyone interested in social thought, politics, media, constructive analysis of our society, or fomenting revolution among the plebeian masses.Beginning with a very interesting scholarly...
  • JonathanT
    1970-01-01
    Absolutely fascinating. Postman writes with an impressive command of the English language and eye-opening contextual insight. (The book was originally published in 1985.) The sentences are crisp, clean, and transition smoothly, making them (somewhat ironically) pleasurable to read. The arguments themselves are tight and progress logically from point to point. Did I agree with every statement? Of course not. Nevertheless, Amusing Ourselves to Deat...